Question and Answers Forum

All Questions      Topic List

Electrostatics Questions

Previous in All Question      Next in All Question      

Previous in Electrostatics      Next in Electrostatics      

Question Number 39573 by NECx last updated on 08/Jul/18

Point charges 88μC,−55μC and  70μC are placed in a straight line.  The central one is 0.75m from  each of the others.Calculate the  net force on each due to the other  two.

$${Point}\:{charges}\:\mathrm{88}\mu{C},−\mathrm{55}\mu{C}\:{and} \\ $$$$\mathrm{70}\mu{C}\:{are}\:{placed}\:{in}\:{a}\:{straight}\:{line}. \\ $$$${The}\:{central}\:{one}\:{is}\:\mathrm{0}.\mathrm{75}{m}\:{from} \\ $$$${each}\:{of}\:{the}\:{others}.{Calculate}\:{the} \\ $$$${net}\:{force}\:{on}\:{each}\:{due}\:{to}\:{the}\:{other} \\ $$$${two}. \\ $$

Commented by NECx last updated on 08/Jul/18

Please give a diagram if necessary.  Thanks in advance.

$${Please}\:{give}\:{a}\:{diagram}\:{if}\:{necessary}. \\ $$$${Thanks}\:{in}\:{advance}. \\ $$$$ \\ $$

Answered by tanmay.chaudhury50@gmail.com last updated on 08/Jul/18

(F)_(−55) ^(88) =9×10^9 ×((88×10^(−6) ×(−55)×10^(−6) )/((^ 0.75)^2 )) forc on  Q=88μC by (−55μC)  attractive  (F)_(77) ^(88) =9×10^9 ×((88×10^(−6) ×70×10^(−6) )/((1.5)^2 ))   repulsi  so net firce on 88C by othdrs two charge is  (F)_(−55) ^(88) ∼(F)_(70) ^(88)   similar way other can be calculated

$$\left({F}\right)_{−\mathrm{55}} ^{\mathrm{88}} =\mathrm{9}×\mathrm{10}^{\mathrm{9}} ×\frac{\mathrm{88}×\mathrm{10}^{−\mathrm{6}} ×\left(−\mathrm{55}\right)×\mathrm{10}^{−\mathrm{6}} }{\left(^{} \mathrm{0}.\mathrm{75}\right)^{\mathrm{2}} }\:{forc}\:{on} \\ $$$${Q}=\mathrm{88}\mu{C}\:{by}\:\left(−\mathrm{55}\mu{C}\right)\:\:{attractive} \\ $$$$\left({F}\right)_{\mathrm{77}} ^{\mathrm{88}} =\mathrm{9}×\mathrm{10}^{\mathrm{9}} ×\frac{\mathrm{88}×\mathrm{10}^{−\mathrm{6}} ×\mathrm{70}×\mathrm{10}^{−\mathrm{6}} }{\left(\mathrm{1}.\mathrm{5}\right)^{\mathrm{2}} }\:\:\:{repulsi} \\ $$$${so}\:{net}\:{firce}\:{on}\:\mathrm{88}{C}\:{by}\:{othdrs}\:{two}\:{charge}\:{is} \\ $$$$\left({F}\right)_{−\mathrm{55}} ^{\mathrm{88}} \sim\left({F}\right)_{\mathrm{70}} ^{\mathrm{88}} \:\:{similar}\:{way}\:{other}\:{can}\:{be}\:{calculated} \\ $$$$ \\ $$

Commented by NECx last updated on 08/Jul/18

But the textbook says 53N,16N and  37.....Please can you enlighten me  on how they came about these results.

$${But}\:{the}\:{textbook}\:{says}\:\mathrm{53}{N},\mathrm{16}{N}\:{and} \\ $$$$\mathrm{37}.....{Please}\:{can}\:{you}\:{enlighten}\:{me} \\ $$$${on}\:{how}\:{they}\:{came}\:{about}\:{these}\:{results}. \\ $$

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Contact: info@tinkutara.com