Question and Answers Forum

All Questions      Topic List

Matrices and Determinants Questions

Previous in All Question      Next in All Question      

Previous in Matrices and Determinants      Next in Matrices and Determinants      

Question Number 76326 by Master last updated on 26/Dec/19

Answered by benjo last updated on 26/Dec/19

using determinan Vandermon de method

$$\mathrm{using}\:\mathrm{determinan}\:\mathrm{Vandermon}\:\mathrm{de}\:\mathrm{method}\: \\ $$

Commented by Master last updated on 26/Dec/19

solution plz

$$\mathrm{solution}\:\mathrm{plz} \\ $$

Answered by john santu last updated on 26/Dec/19

using Crammer rule  N =661, N_x =1322 →x=((1322)/(661))=2  N_y =661, y=((661)/(661))=1  N_z =2644, z=((2644)/(661))=4  N_u =3305, u=((3305)/(661))=5  so by substitusi 4(4)+5−6=5t,   t=3. now we get x + y + z +u + t  =2+1+4+5+3=15

$$\mathrm{using}\:\mathrm{Crammer}\:\mathrm{rule} \\ $$$$\mathrm{N}\:=\mathrm{661},\:\mathrm{N}_{\mathrm{x}} =\mathrm{1322}\:\rightarrow\mathrm{x}=\frac{\mathrm{1322}}{\mathrm{661}}=\mathrm{2} \\ $$$$\mathrm{N}_{\mathrm{y}} =\mathrm{661},\:\mathrm{y}=\frac{\mathrm{661}}{\mathrm{661}}=\mathrm{1} \\ $$$$\mathrm{N}_{\mathrm{z}} =\mathrm{2644},\:\mathrm{z}=\frac{\mathrm{2644}}{\mathrm{661}}=\mathrm{4} \\ $$$$\mathrm{N}_{\mathrm{u}} =\mathrm{3305},\:\mathrm{u}=\frac{\mathrm{3305}}{\mathrm{661}}=\mathrm{5} \\ $$$$\mathrm{so}\:\mathrm{by}\:\mathrm{substitusi}\:\mathrm{4}\left(\mathrm{4}\right)+\mathrm{5}−\mathrm{6}=\mathrm{5t},\: \\ $$$$\mathrm{t}=\mathrm{3}.\:\mathrm{now}\:\mathrm{we}\:\mathrm{get}\:\mathrm{x}\:+\:\mathrm{y}\:+\:\mathrm{z}\:+\mathrm{u}\:+\:\mathrm{t} \\ $$$$=\mathrm{2}+\mathrm{1}+\mathrm{4}+\mathrm{5}+\mathrm{3}=\mathrm{15} \\ $$

Commented by mr W last updated on 26/Dec/19

Commented by mr W last updated on 27/Dec/19

i mean if we don′t need to know  the values for x,y,z,u,t but the  sum of them, or things like  x+2y+3z+4u+5t=? then we can   introduce a new unknown s and  add a new equation like this:  x+2y+3z+4u+5t−s=0   now we only need to determine s:  s=(N_s /N)  ⇒x+2y+3z+4u+5t=s

$${i}\:{mean}\:{if}\:{we}\:{don}'{t}\:{need}\:{to}\:{know} \\ $$$${the}\:{values}\:{for}\:{x},{y},{z},{u},{t}\:{but}\:{the} \\ $$$${sum}\:{of}\:{them},\:{or}\:{things}\:{like} \\ $$$${x}+\mathrm{2}{y}+\mathrm{3}{z}+\mathrm{4}{u}+\mathrm{5}{t}=?\:{then}\:{we}\:{can}\: \\ $$$${introduce}\:{a}\:{new}\:{unknown}\:{s}\:{and} \\ $$$${add}\:{a}\:{new}\:{equation}\:{like}\:{this}: \\ $$$${x}+\mathrm{2}{y}+\mathrm{3}{z}+\mathrm{4}{u}+\mathrm{5}{t}−{s}=\mathrm{0}\: \\ $$$${now}\:{we}\:{only}\:{need}\:{to}\:{determine}\:{s}: \\ $$$${s}=\frac{{N}_{{s}} }{{N}} \\ $$$$\Rightarrow{x}+\mathrm{2}{y}+\mathrm{3}{z}+\mathrm{4}{u}+\mathrm{5}{t}={s}\: \\ $$

Commented by benjo last updated on 27/Dec/19

how to find Ns?

$$\mathrm{how}\:\mathrm{to}\:\mathrm{find}\:\mathrm{Ns}? \\ $$

Commented by mr W last updated on 27/Dec/19

i assumed you know Cramer rule.

$${i}\:{assumed}\:{you}\:{know}\:{Cramer}\:{rule}. \\ $$

Commented by mr W last updated on 27/Dec/19

Commented by john santu last updated on 27/Dec/19

but the value x + y +z+u+t sir   not x +2y+3z+4u+5t?

$${but}\:{the}\:{value}\:{x}\:+\:{y}\:+{z}+{u}+{t}\:{sir}\: \\ $$$${not}\:{x}\:+\mathrm{2}{y}+\mathrm{3}{z}+\mathrm{4}{u}+\mathrm{5}{t}? \\ $$

Commented by mr W last updated on 27/Dec/19

you should understand me. i just  wanted to show an example if we  need to know the value of  x +2y+3z+4u+5t !!!

$${you}\:{should}\:{understand}\:{me}.\:{i}\:{just} \\ $$$${wanted}\:{to}\:{show}\:{an}\:{example}\:{if}\:{we} \\ $$$${need}\:{to}\:{know}\:{the}\:{value}\:{of} \\ $$$${x}\:+\mathrm{2}{y}+\mathrm{3}{z}+\mathrm{4}{u}+\mathrm{5}{t}\:!!! \\ $$

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Contact: info@tinkutara.com